The Regulation of SPRY4 Intronic Transcript 1 (SPRY4-IT1) on KIT Signaling and Imatinib Resistance of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST) Cells
Abstract
BACKGROUND: SPRY4 intronic transcript 1 (SPRY4-IT1), is a long non-coding RNA coded by the intron of SPRY4. SPRY4 is highly expressed in gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) and inhibits the tumorigenesis of GIST, but whether SPRY4-IT1 regulates the tumorigenesis of GIST or not remains unclear. Therefore, in this study, the regulation of SPRY4-IT1 expression and its role in GIST will be investigated.
METHODS: GIST-T1 cells, and Ba/F3 cells which express KIT proto-oncogene (KIT) and SPRY4-IT1 were used as cell models. Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was used to examine mRNA expression, while the protein expression and signal transduction were examined by western blot. The association between SPRY4-IT1 and KIT was examined by pull down of KIT and PCR. Cell proliferation, survival, and cell cycle progression were examined by cell counting kit-8 (CCK8) and flow cytometry.
RESULTS: KIT mutants increased the expression of SPRY4-IT1 in GIST. SPRY4-IT1 bound to KIT, also enhanced the activation and expression of both wild-type KIT and primary KIT mutants, therefore increasing the activation of downstream signaling proteins AKT and ERK of KIT, GIST cell survival, and proliferation. In addition, SPRY4-IT1 reduced the sensitivity of wild-type KIT, or primary KIT mutants to the first-line targeted therapeutic drug of GIST, imatinib, which can inhibit KIT activation. Gaining drug-resistant secondary KIT mutants might be one of the main reasons of GIST recurrence after targeted therapy. Similar to wild-type KIT and primary KIT mutants, the activation and expression of secondary KIT mutants and their resistance to imatinib were also increased by SPRY4-IT1.
CONCLUSION: The results indicated positive feedback between SPRY4-IT1 and wild-type KIT, primary KIT mutants or secondary KIT mutants, and the upregulation of AKT and ERK activation by SPRY4-IT1 in GIST cells, providing a new insight in the KIT signaling regulation in GIST, and the resistance of GIST to targeted therapy.
KEYWORDS: SPRY4-IT1, KIT, GIST, SPRY4, signaling
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Soreide K, Sandvik OM, Soreide JA, Giljaca V, Jureckova A, Bulusu VR. Global epidemiology of gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST): A systematic review of population-based cohort studies. Cancer Epidemiol. 2016; 40: 39-46, CrossRef.
Hirota S, Isozaki K, Moriyama Y, Hashimoto K, Nishida T, Ishiguro S, et al. Gain-of-function mutations of c-kit in human gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Science. 1998; 279(5350): 577-80, CrossRef.
Kang HJ, Nam SW, Kim H, Rhee H, Kim NG, Kim H, et al. Correlation of KIT and platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha mutations with gene activation and expression profiles in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Oncogene. 2005; 24(6): 1066-74, CrossRef.
Steigen SE, Eide TJ, Wasag B, Lasota J, Miettinen M. Mutations in gastrointestinal stromal tumors--a population-based study from Northern Norway. APMIS. 2007; 115(4): 289-98, CrossRef.
Agaram NP, Wong GC, Guo T, Maki RG, Singer S, Dematteo RP, et al. Novel V600E BRAF mutations in imatinib-naive and imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2008; 47(10): 853-9, CrossRef.
Emile JF, Brahimi S, Coindre JM, Bringuier PP, Monges G, Samb P, et al. Frequencies of KIT and PDGFRA mutations in the MolecGIST prospective population-based study differ from those of advanced GISTs. Med Oncol. 2012; 29(3): 1765-72, CrossRef.
Nishida T, Yoshinaga S, Takahashi T, Naito Y. Recent progress and challenges in the diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Cancers. 2021; 13(13): 3158, CrossRef.
Patel SR, Reichardt P. An updated review of the treatment landscape for advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Cancer. 2021; 127(13): 2187-95, CrossRef.
Tsai M, Valent P, Galli SJ. KIT as a master regulator of the mast cell lineage. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2022; 149(6): 1845-54, CrossRef.
Lennartsson J, Ronnstrand L. Stem cell factor receptor/c-Kit: From basic science to clinical implications. Physiol Rev. 2012; 92(4): 1619-49, CrossRef.
Joensuu H, Roberts PJ, Sarlomo-Rikala M, Andersson LC, Tervahartiala P, Tuveson D, et al. Effect of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor STI571 in a patient with a metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor. N Engl J Med. 2001; 344(14): 1052-6, CrossRef.
Chen LL, Trent JC, Wu EF, Fuller GN, Ramdas L, Zhang W, et al. A missense mutation in KIT kinase domain 1 correlates with imatinib resistance in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Cancer Res. 2004; 64(17): 5913-9, CrossRef.
Antonescu CR, Besmer P, Guo T, Arkun K, Hom G, Koryotowski B, et al. Acquired resistance to imatinib in gastrointestinal stromal tumor occurs through secondary gene mutation. Clin Cancer Res. 2005; 11(11): 4182-90, CrossRef.
Cao J, Wei J, Yang P, Zhang T, Chen Z, He F, et al. Genome-scale CRISPR-Cas9 knockout screening in gastrointestinal stromal tumor with Imatinib resistance. Mol Cancer. 2018; 17(1): 121, CrossRef.
Huang WK, Akcakaya P, Gangaev A, Lee L, Zeljic K, Hajeri P, et al. miR-125a-5p regulation increases phosphorylation of FAK that contributes to imatinib resistance in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Exp Cell Res. 2018; 371(1): 287-96, CrossRef.
Demetri GD, van Oosterom AT, Garrett CR, Blackstein ME, Shah MH, Verweij J, et al. Efficacy and safety of sunitinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumour after failure of imatinib: Arandomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2006; 368(9544): 1329-38, CrossRef.
Demetri GD, Reichardt P, Kang YK, Blay JY, Rutkowski P, Gelderblom H, et al. Efficacy and safety of regorafenib for advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours after failure of imatinib and sunitinib (GRID): An international, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2013; 381(9863): 295-302, CrossRef.
Blay JY, Serrano C, Heinrich MC, Zalcberg J, Bauer S, Gelderblom H, et al. Ripretinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours (INVICTUS): A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2020; 21(7): 923-34, CrossRef.
Nielsen TO, West RB, Linn SC, Alter O, Knowling MA, O'Connell JX, et al. Molecular characterisation of soft tissue tumours: A gene expression study. Lancet. 2002; 359(9314): 1301-7, CrossRef.
Li S, Zhao S, Liang N, Zhang S, Zhang L, Zhou L, et al. SPRY4 inhibits and sensitizes the primary KIT mutants in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) to imatinib. Gastric Cancer. 2023; 26(5): 677-90, CrossRef.
Khaitan D, Dinger ME, Mazar J, Crawford J, Smith MA, Mattick JS, et al. The melanoma-upregulated long noncoding RNA SPRY4-IT1 modulates apoptosis and invasion. Cancer Res. 2011; 71(11): 3852-62, CrossRef.
Nakatani H, Kobayashi M, Jin T, Taguchi T, Sugimoto T, Nakano T, et al. STI571 (Glivec) inhibits the interaction between c-KIT and heat shock protein 90 of the gastrointestinal stromal tumor cell line, GIST-T1. Cancer Sci. 2005; 96(2): 116-9, CrossRef.
Zhu G, Shi J, Zhang S, Guo Y, Huang L, Zhao H, et al. Loss of PI3 kinase association improves the sensitivity of secondary mutation of KIT to Imatinib. Cell Biosci. 2020; 10: 16, CrossRef.
Savitri M, Bintoro UY, Sedana MP, Diansyah MN, Romadhon PZ, Amrita PNA, et al. Circulating plasma miRNA-21 as a superior biomarker compared to CA 15-3: Assessment in healthy age matched subjects and different stage of breast cancer patients. Indones Biomed J. 2020; 12(2): 157-64, CrossRef.
Meiliana A, Wijaya A. Identiication of biomarkers for prostate cancer. Indones Biomed J. 2014; 6(3): 123-36, CrossRef.
Ghafouri-Fard S, Khoshbakht T, Taheri M, Shojaei S. A review on the role of SPRY4-IT1 in the carcinogenesis. Front Oncol. 2021; 11: 779483, CrossRef.
Liu D, Li Y, Luo G, Xiao X, Tao D, Wu X, et al. LncRNA SPRY4-IT1 sponges miR-101-3p to promote proliferation and metastasis of bladder cancer cells through up-regulating EZH2. Cancer Lett. 2017; 388: 281-91, CrossRef.
Song X, Zhang X, Wang X, Chen L, Jiang L, Zheng A, et al. LncRNA SPRY4-IT1 regulates breast cancer cell stemness through competitively binding miR-6882-3p with TCF7L2. J Cell Mol Med. 2020; 24(1): 772-84, CrossRef.
Li Z, Tang X, Duan S. Interference from LncRNA SPRY4-IT1 restrains the proliferation, migration, and invasion of melanoma cells through inactivating MAPK pathway by up-regulating miR-22-3p. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2019; 12(2): 477-87, PMID.
Huang C, Wang M, Zhao WY, Shen YY, Zhuang C, Ni B, et al. Long noncoding RNA SPRY4-IT1 acts as a miR-101-5p sponge to promote gastrointestinal stromal tumor progression by inhibiting ZEB1. Am J Transl Res. 2023; 15(2): 1026-40, PMID.
Sun J, Pedersen M, Ronnstrand L. The D816V mutation of c-Kit circumvents a requirement for Src family kinases in c-Kit signal transduction. J Biol Chem. 2009; 284(17): 11039-47, CrossRef.
Lindblad O, Kazi JU, Ronnstrand L, Sun J. PI3 kinase is indispensable for oncogenic transformation by the V560D mutant of c-Kit in a kinase-independent manner. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2015; 72(22): 4399-407, CrossRef.
Sun J, Mohlin S, Lundby A, Kazi JU, Hellman U, Pahlman S, et al. The PI3-kinase isoform p110delta is essential for cell transformation induced by the D816V mutant of c-Kit in a lipid-kinase-independent manner. Oncogene. 2014; 33(46): 5360-9, CrossRef.
Meiliana A, Dewi NM, Wijaya A. CAR-T Cells: Precision Cancer Immunotherapy. Indones Biomed J. 2018; 10(3): 203-16, CrossRef.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18585/inabj.v16i4.3084
Copyright (c) 2024 The Prodia Education and Research Institute
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Indexed by:
The Prodia Education and Research Institute